Presets for Lightroom - FLTR

Over 1,000 presets with manual transfer steps

FLTR organizes its offer into three distinct layers. The first is a library of more than 1,000 Lightroom presets spanning over 80 packs, covering portraits, food, urban landscapes, and nature. The second is a set of standalone photo and video filters that work entirely inside the app, no Lightroom subscription required. The third layer adds iPhone app icons and Instagram highlight covers for profile-level aesthetic consistency. Each pillar functions as advertised, but none reaches the depth of a dedicated competitor. The preset transfer process, which involves copying DNG files into Lightroom Mobile, adds manual steps that casual users may find unexpectedly fiddly. The standalone filters are more accessible but feel secondary to the main preset pitch.

Heavy install size, slow browsing, stable performance

At 220 MB the install sits on the heavier side for a utility app, though that figure reflects a genuinely large asset library rather than obvious bloat. The 4.84 rating held across more than 81,000 reviews is a strong qualitative signal that crashes and major bugs are not widespread complaints. Browsing more than 1,000 presets can feel slow when you are trying to narrow a choice quickly, and the multi-section layout means navigating between presets, filters, and icons requires deliberate taps. Nothing here suggests a technically unstable product, but the sheer volume of content means first-time users should expect a short orientation period before the workflow feels natural.

Free tier with paywalled preset packs

The free entry price removes any barrier to trying the app, which explains much of its review volume. The honest caveat is that the most polished or niche preset packs are almost certainly gated behind in-app purchases, a standard model in this category. Users who download FLTR expecting the full catalog for free will hit a paywall before long. For creators who only need a handful of versatile presets to establish a consistent feed aesthetic, the free tier may be enough. For photographers chasing a specific look across a large back catalog, the cumulative cost of unlocking packs is worth factoring into the decision before committing.

Standard photo library access, privacy label available

FLTR carries a 4+ content rating, which signals no mature content concerns. For a precise picture of what data the app collects and how it is used, the App Store privacy nutrition label on the app's product page is the authoritative source. Photo editing apps in this category typically request access to the photo library, which is expected for core functionality. Users who prefer minimal data sharing should review those declared data types and consider whether optional permissions, such as analytics or tracking, can be declined at the system level before granting broad access.

Coherent layout for large content library

The interface organizes a genuinely large content library into browsable packs with preview thumbnails, which is a sensible approach to the navigation challenge. Visual consistency across the preset, filter, and customization sections gives the app a coherent aesthetic that aligns with its target audience. Accessibility specifics, such as VoiceOver labeling on preview images or Dynamic Type support, are not verifiable without hands-on testing, but the 4+ content rating and broad consumer audience suggest the developer targets mainstream usability. Creators who rely on assistive technologies should test the free tier before committing to any purchases, as image-heavy grid layouts can vary significantly in screen-reader friendliness.

Seven years of continuous development and updates

A July 2026 update on an app that launched in June 2019 represents more than seven years of continuous development, which is a meaningful commitment in a category where many competitors go dormant within a year or two. Version 4.22.0 suggests a cadence of incremental improvements rather than infrequent major overhauls. The combination of a high rating, a large review count, and recent updates points to a developer that monitors user feedback and ships fixes with reasonable regularity. That track record gives reasonable confidence that the app will continue to receive support, though the pace of new preset additions or feature expansions is not publicly documented.